Monday, June 28, 2010

National Security At Risk

Looks like President Obama is still sitting on his hands when it comes to ensuring our national security. Earlier this month, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer sat in the Oval Office with President Barack Obama to discuss the critical issue of border security. The Governor personally related to the President the concerns of millions of Arizonans over the lack of security on Arizona’s southern border. During their visit, President Obama committed to present details, within two weeks of their meeting, regarding his plans to commit National Guard troops to the Arizona border and commit to spend $500 million in additional funds on border security.

Two weeks have come and gone and still it’s all talk and no action.

Two days ago, Brewer sent a letter to the President outlining her Four-Point Border Surge Strategy. Here is what she wrote:

Dear Mr. President:

Thank you for the opportunity to visit with you in person during my recent trip to Washington, D.C. As you know, the issue of border security is foremost in the thoughts of many Arizonans and Americans alike, and I appreciated the chance to personally relate to you my concerns and outline my proposed solutions.

Mr. President, the need for action to secure Arizona's border could not be clearer. Recently, my office received a number of calls from constituents concerned at reports of new sign postings in interior counties of Arizona warning residents not to access federal lands due to criminal activity associated with the border. These warnings signal to some that we have handed over portions of our border areas to illegal immigrants and drug traffickers. This is unacceptable.

Instead of warning Americans to stay out of parts of our own country, we ought to be warning international lawbreakers that they will be detained and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. We ought to be establishing measures to ensure that illegal traffic of any sort is kept to an absolute minimum, and that Americans are safe and secure within our own borders.

When we visited, you committed to present details, within two weeks of our meeting, regarding your plans to commit National Guard troops to the Arizona border and expend $500 million in additional funds on border security matters. You also discussed sending members of your senior staff to Arizona to discuss your plans. While I am pleased the 28th has been set for a meeting time and we have reviewed a copy of the Department of Homeland Security's "Southwest Border Next Step."

Governer Jan Brewer

My friends, look up! for your redemption draws near!

Monday, June 14, 2010

Another Mass-Extinction In Progress?

You thought the oil spill was bad? It could be worse. What about the dispersants that they are dumping into the Gulf in an effort to break it up? Do they really believe that's going to help take care of the problem, or are they doing it just for the camera, as they say, hoping that people will feel better about it because something is being done? Could it be that they don't really care whether these dispersants harm the marine life or not? Could it be that they chose the dispersants they did because they stand to gain financially from using them?

Find answers to these questions and more in this article and by following the links that they provide. Even before the oil spill, our oceans were on the verge of some mass extinctions. Is this what is going to tip it over the edge?

"And the second angel poured out his vial upon the sea; and it became as the blood of a dead person: and every living thing died in the sea." Revelation 16:3

The call goes out - the end is near. Look up, for your redemption draweth nigh. And the Spirit and the Bride say, "Come".

Monday, May 31, 2010

Terrorists Ambush Israeli Inspectors

Wait a minute... that's not what the mainstream media has been saying. Well, you need to get your facts straight. Do your homework. Get the REAL story!

A fleet of ships left Turkey under the pretense of sending humanitarian aid to the people living in the impoverished Gaza Strip, but with the expressed purpose of breaching a blockade that Israel set up to protect its own country. The boats reached the blockade, and the Israelis inspected the vessels one by one, as they have many times in the past. Everything went peacefully until they came to the sixth boat. As they boarded the sixth vessel members of the Turkish crew attacked them with sticks and pipes, knives and bats. Unable to subdue the brutal assault with paintball guns and tear gas, the Israelis opened fire, killing nine.

That's one side of the story. The other side states that the Israelis were the first to fire, unprovoked, from both air and sea, before they even boarded the ships.

Who, if anyone, should we believe? Stories abound about the Turkish flotilla being full of "peace activists." What is a "peace activist?" If you play any part in a mission to bring weapons to people, are you innocent? If you knowingly board a ship that intends to breach the security of another nation, are you innocent? If a person knowingly and willingly puts himself in danger, does he or she not assume all responsibility for whatever happens?

The truth is, I have not heard or seen anything yet that proves the Israelis were in the wrong for doing what they did. And I have read both sides of the story. Even if they came up at dawn and conducted a surprise attack, even if it was in international waters, can they be blamed? With all the statements that had been coming from those who organized and operated the flotilla, could Israel be confident that the safety of its citizens would not be jeopardized if this flotilla arrived in Gaza un-inspected? Since the flotilla was being sent specifically to violate the blockade, was Israel not justified? Since the ship did not respond to repeated requests to stop and undergo routine inspection, was Israel not justified?

Yes, the people of Gaza are impoverished. It is not Israel's fault. The blame rests squarely on the shoulders of the Gaza government. If they would settle down and get a life, and try to live and let live, their people could prosper. If they resolve to co-exist with Israel and show it with their actions, Israel would not need a blockade to inspect everything that comes into the country.

If your fellow citizens were in danger of their lives, would you not support a blockade, including the use of force if anyone tried to slip through without inspection? How about a convoy trying to enter your city, which was known to be associated with terrorists? Would you not want them to be searched? Why, we are by law even privileged to keep within a reasonable limit what goes on in our neighbor's yard! No, compared with the way Hamas has been treating Israel, I don't see that Israel did anything out of line.

"Shalom" to all.

Monday, May 10, 2010

Dismay Over Oil Spill Fueling Drive For Alternative Energy

While we are watching the massive and expanding oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico, and the blame game is starting in Washington, I want to ask a few questions: who is really responsible? Sure, BP seems to have been the corporation in charge of the actual drilling, and everybody else involved was simply working as subcontractors, but why did BP go there in the first place?

Now, before you get excited, I'm not shifting the blame to all the common people that consume oil. I want to take a good look at all the politicians and special interest groups that may have influenced or encouraged BP to go there. I need to ask some questions, and I don't know the answers to all these questions. I'd be happy to have some help in finding the real answers.

Why have oil companies turned to drilling offshore to the extent that they have, when we have enough oil reserves here on the mainland to satisfy our nation's demand for many, many years? Has nobody considered the possibility of something like this happening? Did they really think the benefits outweighed the risks?

Look, I know that drilling for oil on land has its impact on the environment, and I understand taking precautions against further endangering species that may already be threatened with extinction, but is that really worse than oil in the ocean and oil on the beaches? Why have the environmentalists been so adamant about no more drilling in the great reserves that lie along the Rockies and yet do so little about drilling in the ocean where something like this might happen and destroy nature on a much, much greater scale?

Like I said, I don't know all the answers, but here's a few things I do know. The environmentalist movement was started with a noble purpose. Those who founded it had wisdom and common sense. Their concerns and objectives were such as I myself share. But their organization was hijacked. Some of the same people that used to be leaders of the Communist Party are currently in charge of some of the most influential environmentalist groups.

Could it be that they are knowingly promoting policy that is destructive to our once great nation? The Communists have always hated us; always been jealous of us. We need to take a serious look at these questions and find out what's going on. Then, we need to be proactive about it -- do not tolerate more drilling offshore or in any foreign nation as long as we have so much right here in our own country. It is no less harmful to the environment to drill in any of these other places than it is to drill in our vast oilfields out west.

Ultimately we need to individually take a more active role in using alternative energy sources. Here is a video outlining some of the latest exciting advances in energy technology.

All it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.

Monday, April 26, 2010

State Sovereignty Being Attacked Again

Arizona has made a bold move. They have passed tough new immigration laws. The governor signed the bill on Friday, saying that because Washington has failed to take care of the problem with illegal immigrants, Arizona had to act on its own to protect its legal residents.

And that is a valid concern. In March, a rancher was found shot to death in his all-terrain vehicle. Being right at the border with Mexico, it is believed that the murderer was an illegal immigrant or a drug dealer, or both. It is clear that the border is not secure. Anybody that claims it is, is a liar. Why does the federal government let this go on? I know why. To a large extent, at least. Because of politics, and (don't forget this one!) because of who they are working for! That's right. The federal government is no longer working for the American people. This has been proved over and over by them doing so many things in direct contradiction to the will of the public majority.

But that is not my subject today. The new bill, which by the way is mostly just enforcing laws that had already been in place, has caused a lot of furor, and even the president is threatening to take action against it. Opponents of the bill argue that it encroaches on the federal government's authority to regulate immigration and violates people's constitutional rights by giving police too much power. (Could it be that the president is concerned about his own inability to provide proof of citizenship? I'm sure it strikes a nerve.)

Those of you that share these concerns, let me ask you: Who gave the federal government that authority? and do the states not have any authority to regulate immigration? For a state to crack down harder than the national government is perfectly legal, and the states should have that right. Now, it would be quite another thing if a state would disregard or claim exemption from a national law clamping down on illegal immigration for the sake of national security. And as for violating people's constitutional rights -- wait a minute! Anybody that is here illegally has no constitutional rights! That's right, the constitution is only for legal American citizens.

One reason Arizona passed the law is because the state is financially broke, and they are desperate to cut down on aid to those that do not legally qualify. The president of Mexico says the law is discriminatory and warned that trade and political ties with Arizona will be seriously strained by the crackdown.

Discriminatory?! Let's get this clear -- discriminate against whom? To discriminate involves excluding or restricting members of one group from opportunities that are available to other groups. I do not hate Mexicans. In fact, I have some very lovely Hispanic friends. This bill does not discriminate against Hispanics, neither is it designed to. It discriminates against illegals! Even many legal Hispanic immigrants are fed up with the immigration of illegals. Why? Because it affects them the same way it affects everybody else. Negatively. Yes, I suppose there comes a time when you must enforce the laws to bring freedom and justice first of all for those to whom it belongs: the legal citizens of the state!

Thomas Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, who also thinks Arizona is taking it too far, made the following statement: "If every state had its own laws, we wouldn't be one country; we'd be 50 different countries."

This is so twisted you could have a hard time getting your head straight again! Quite the contrary is true. Every state makes its own laws (in fact, some states have a clause in their constitution allowing them under certain circumstances to leave the United States! This is the way it should be.) If every state had identical laws, we would no longer be 50 states, but one great nation state with no more need for state governors or legislators. Or state lines, for that matter.

Way to go, Arizona! We stand behind you with full support.

My friends, live free or die!

Monday, April 19, 2010

US Has Largest Known Oil Reserves In The World

A while back, a well-known news program was interviewing one of the Forbes Brothers. The host said to Forbes, "I am going to ask you a direct question and I would like a direct answer: “How much oil does the U.S. have in the ground?” Forbes did not miss a beat, he said, "More than all the Middle East put together."

The U.S. Geological Service issued a report in April 2008 that only scientists and oil men knew was coming. It was a revised report (hadn't been updated since 1995) on how much oil was in this area of the western 2/3 of North Dakota, western South Dakota, and extreme eastern Montana. The Bakken is the largest domestic oil discovery since Alaska's Prudhoe Bay, and has the potential to greatly reduce American dependence on foreign oil. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates it at up to 503 billion barrels. Even if just 10% of the oil is recoverable... at $107 a barrel, we're looking at a resource base worth more than $5.3 trillion.

"When I first briefed legislators on this, you could practically see their jaws hit the floor. They had no idea." says Terry Johnson, the Montana Legislature's financial analyst. "This sizable find is now the highest-producing onshore oil field found in the past 56 years," reports The Pittsburgh Post Gazette. (This was two years before this updated report!) It's a formation known as the Williston Basin, but is more commonly referred to as the 'Bakken.' It stretches from Northern Montana, through North Dakota and into Canada. For years, U.S. oil exploration has been considered a dead end. Even the 'Big Oil' companies gave up searching for major oil wells decades ago. However, a recent technological breakthrough has opened up the Bakken's massive reserves, and we now have access of up to 500 billion barrels. And because this is light, sweet oil, those billions of barrels will cost Americans just $16 PER BARREL!

Here’s another headline:

U. S. Oil Discovery- Largest Reserve in the World

Stansberry Report Online - 4/20/2006

Hidden 1,000 feet beneath the surface of the Rocky Mountains lies the largest untapped oil reserve in the world. It is more than 2 TRILLION barrels. On August 8, 2005 President Bush mandated its extraction. In three and a half years of high oil prices none has been extracted. With this motherload of oil why are we still fighting over off-shore drilling?

How can this be? How can we NOT be extracting this? Because the environmentalists and others have blocked all efforts to help America become independent of foreign oil! Again, we are letting a small group of people dictate our lives and our economy.....WHY?

James Bartis, a researcher on a related study says we've got more oil in this very compact area than the entire Middle East - more than 2 TRILLION barrels untapped. That's more than all the proven oil reserves of crude oil in the world today, reports The Denver Post.

Don't think 'OPEC' will drop its price - even with this find? Think again!

It's all about the competitive marketplace, - it has to. Think OPEC just might be funding the environmentalists? Click here to read the USGS article. Let freedom and peace prevail!!

Monday, April 12, 2010

Mask Coming Off Child Sacrifice

The Obama Administration has just peeled off one of the false faces of the pro-abortion groups. For years, abortion rights activists have asserted the right to choose whether they could have an abortion or not, arguing more or less effectively that the government should not be involved in their personal choices, in this case meaning medical choices. Now, with the health care reform bill dubbed ObamaCare, the government has been brought into making medical decisions for you way, way beyond anything an abortion ban would have done. This proves what most of us have known all along: they are not actually against government involvement. All they want is pleasure without responsibility, and sin without consequences. Click here to read a very good article about this subject.

There is a limit to what choices the people should have the freedom to make. For example, we have laws to prevent the over-killing of animals. We have laws to bring to justice those who commit murder. Have you never considered that when one hates another so much he wants to kill him, he might feel justified in it and even think it a personal right to do so? Or when one is simply an inconvenience, or a burden, should others not have the right to kill him? Whatever happened to the sanctity of human life?? Whatever happened to the Supreme Laws of God, where He said, "Thou shalt not kill?"

The truth is, these people with a liberal mindset are, whether they know it or not, pawns being used by the globalists to create a worldwide socialist government. A major part of their agenda is depopulation. Abortion serves many purposes. It keeps the population down, especially the black race. (By the way, that's why HIV was invented, too.) But it also propagates a godless, irresponsible society. It undermines respect for human life. And it brings the wrath of God upon the people. Child sacrifice is an abomination to Jehovah, no matter what shape or form it takes.

Who will speak up for those innocent ones who cannot help themselves???

Monday, March 22, 2010

States Scramble To Preserve State Sovereignty

State attorneys general are lining up to file a lawsuit against the healthcare legislation passed by Congress.

“The health care reform legislation passed by the U.S. House of Representatives last night clearly violates the U.S. Constitution and infringes on each state’s sovereignty,” Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum said in a prepared statement announcing a news conference.

Virginia's attorney general said he plans to sue the federal government over the healthcare reform legislation, saying Congress lacks authority to force people to buy health insurance.

Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli said on Monday that Congress lacks authority under its constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce to force people to buy insurance. He said the bill also conflicts with a state law that says Virginians cannot be required to buy insurance.

"If a person decides not to buy health insurance, that person by definition is not engaging in commerce," Cuccinelli said in recorded comments. "If you are not engaging in commerce, how can the federal government regulate you?"

Cuccinelli said he plans to file his lawsuit in federal court in Richmond, Virginia, after President Barack Obama signs the bill into law, which he is expected to do.

The bill requires most Americans to have health coverage. It was passed on Sunday night by a 219-212 vote.

A good video to watch about what is happening to our once great country can be found by clicking here.

Some more lawsuits may be in the making too. Here is a link to an article outlining some more legal action.

My friends, live free or die.

Monday, March 15, 2010

History To Be Re-Written

The Texas State board of Education has approved some controversial changes to what most students in the state will be studying in history, economic, and social study classes. Don McElroy, a board leader, explained that the measure is a way of "adding balance" in the classroom, since "academia is skewed too far to the left." And the board's critics have labeled the move an attempt by political "extremists" to "promote their ideology."

We hope this isn't so. Public school is to educate the next generation in general about the facts of history, regardless of whether they embarrass you or not. Naturally, liberals and conservatives will have differing views about the language that should be used. For instance, I believe the current curriculum is unfair and needs to be overhauled. The language is not neutral enough. Those with a "progressive" world view, on the other hand, have been endorsing changes in the other direction.

The main reason this has gained national attention is because Texas is one of the nation's largest consumers of school textbooks, and because of that, the textbook publishers tend to cater to their needs. It's part of the law of supply and demand - since there is such a huge demand for textbooks that meet the Texas standards, there will be a huge supply printed to meet that need. As a result, 80% of school districts around the nation end up with the same curriculum.

Here are just a few of the changes the Texas Board would like to make, and it may affect what your child will study:

* They would like to put more emphasis on "the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s." This means not only increased favorable mentions of Phyllis Schlafly, the founder of the Eagle Forum, but also more discussion of the Moral Majority, the Heritage Foundation, the National Rifle Association and Newt Gingrich's Contract With America. (All that sounds good to me. I mean, these are things that actually happened, and impacted America very, very profoundly.)

* They want to reduce coverage of Latino history and culture. (Now this is a sticky one for Texas. I understand that Hispanics have been living there for hundreds of years longer than white Americans. And I understand that those of Hispanic descent may want recognition of their roots and perpetuation of their identity. But how about expanded studies of the native Americans? How about expanding the coverage of the history and culture of England and Germany and the Scandinavian countries that populated early America and forcing our children to learn about all them right alongside that of Latino history and culture? My point is this: When you become an American citizen you should learn about the history of America. It is the duty of the family or local community to preserve whatever historical or cultural identity they want to preserve. Take a look at the Amish. They have done it well for hundreds of years. This is America. If you want to be American, learn the American way. If you want to be something else, fine, but don't make American schools teach your way of life.)

The proposals will come up for a final vote in May. Many of those that are crying "foul" are saying, "We just want things to be historically accurate." Believe me, those of us that are more conservative also want things to be historically accurate. But omitting important events and details that are contrary to your values is not being "historically accurate."

Let freedom reign, and the truth be told.

Monday, March 8, 2010

The Lowest Crime Rate In The World

Do you know which country has the lowest crime rate in the world? Switzerland. Do you know why? It may have something to do with their military system.

The key to freedom is to have the ability to defend yourself, and if you don't have the tools to do that, then you're going to be at the mercy of whomever wants to put you away.

Guns are deeply rooted within Swiss culture – but the gun crime rate is so low that statistics are not even kept. The country has a population of six million, but there are estimated to be at least two million publicly-owned firearms, including about 600,000 automatic rifles and 500,000 pistols. This is due in large part to Switzerland’s unique system of national defense, developed over the centuries.

Instead of a standing, full-time army, the country requires every man to undergo some form of military training for a few days or weeks a year throughout most of their lives. You can learn more by watching this video.

According to researchers, gun violence often occurs in places undergoing rapid urban growth, and when lawless areas are created by extreme poverty and the absence of effective policing.

My personal belief concerning this phenomenon is that when you take God out of a culture, lawlessness and violence will quickly take over, no matter what kind of law enforcement is in place. There is a very deliberate campaign afoot to destroy America from the inside out, and their primary means of doing so is to secularize the society. We as Ambassadors for Christ must forget about the political landscape as being the answer to the moral woes of this country and (while I believe in voting and educating yourself about the issues) we need to step up personal evangelism. The number one reason this country is unraveling everywhere at once and with ever-increasing speed is because people are becoming lukewarm about their spirituality. Multitudes are losing faith, losing hope, and giving up.

Don't give up, my friends! Where there is life, there is hope. Jesus is alive! And life is worth the living just because He lives!

Monday, March 1, 2010

Rifqa Bary's Life Still In Danger

Rifqa Bary is still not safe. Pray for her. Above all, pray that she stand strong and faithful to Jesus no matter what happens. Read more about her current status here.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Could You Be A Leader?

Yes, you could. In fact, you are already a leader. Somebody follows you. Somebody is watching you and is learning to be like you. So the real question is, “Can you be a good leader?” If you learn to channel your frustrations and energy into a constructive and positive force, you can and are.

Remember Lee Iacocca, the man who rescued Chrysler Corporation from its death throes in the 1980’s? He wrote a book called, 'Where Have All The Leaders Gone?'.

Lee Iacocca Says:

“Am I the only guy in this country who's fed up with what's happening? We should be screaming bloody murder! Our government is trying to steer our ship of state right over a cliff, we've got corporate gangsters stealing us blind, and we can't even run a ridiculous cash-for-clunkers program without losing $26 billion of the taxpayers' money, much less build a hybrid car. But instead of getting mad, everyone sits around and nods their heads when the politicians say, 'trust me, the economy is getting better..'

"Better? You've got to be kidding. This is America , not the 'Titanic'. I'll give you a sound bite: 'Throw all the lawmakers out along with the president!'

"I'll go a step further. You can't call yourself a patriot if you're not outraged. This is a fight I'm ready and willing to have. The Biggest 'C' is Crisis! (Iacocca elaborates on nine C's of leadership, with crisis being the first.)

"Leaders are made, not born. Leadership is forged in times of crisis. It's one thing to sit there and talk theory. Or send someone else's kids off to war when you've never seen a battlefield yourself. It's another thing to lead when your world comes tumbling down.

"We're running the biggest deficit in the history of the world, and it's getting worse every day!

"We've lost the manufacturing edge to Asia , while our once-great companies are getting slaughtered by health care costs..

"Our borders are like sieves and they want to give all illegals amnesty and free healthcare.

"These are times that cry out for leadership.

"But when you look around, you've got to ask: 'Where have all the leaders gone?' Where are the curious, creative communicators? Where are the people of character, courage, conviction, omnipotence, and common sense?

"Name me a leader who has a better idea for homeland security than making us take off our shoes in airports and throw away our shampoo?

"We've spent billions of dollars building a huge new bureaucracy, and all we know how to do is react to things that have already happened..

"Everyone's hunkering down, fingers crossed, hoping the government will make it better for them. Now, that's just crazy.. Deal with life.

"I have news for the gangsters in Congress. We didn't elect you to turn this country into a losing European Socialist state. What is everybody so afraid of? That some bobblehead on TV will call them a name? Give me a break. Why don't you guys show some spine for a change?

"Had Enough? Hey, I'm not trying to be the voice of gloom and doom here. I'm trying to light a fire. I'm speaking out because I have hope - I believe in America .. In my lifetime, I've had the privilege of living through some of America 's greatest moments. I've also experienced some of our worst crises: The 'Great Depression,' 'World War II,' the 'Korean War,' the 'Kennedy Assassination,' the 'Vietnam War,' the 1970's oil crisis, and the struggles of recent years since 9/11.”

Now that’s someone who dares to be a leader! All it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Will China Rule The World?

It was a commonly held belief among American government and business elites that as China became richer, their values and interests would become more like ours. But it's not working that way. While America strives for stability in the world, China is a Communist country striving for military and economic superiority. China's voice is becoming louder and more demanding, and one of these days we may well have to choose between giving her whatever she wants or suffer the military consequences. Learn more from the Phyllis Schlafly Report and this article from The Washington Post.

But more disturbing than the thought that China may one day control the world is the fact that the United Nations, which was formed with the thought in mind that it would one day grow into a world government, is now run and influenced by people who look at China as the role model for their beloved and long-awaited One World Government. I may be in trouble with the Vatican for saying this, but I believe the failure of the Copenhagen meetings in December was absolutely a godsend.

So I must ask myself the question - and I ask each of you the same question: "What are you going to do with the opportunity and freedoms you still have?" You are here for a purpose, and Jesus Christ holds the key to the fulfillment of that purpose. Not some church, nor some bishop or pope, but the Holy Spirit. Do you know Him?? There is still time.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Jesus Is Coming Soon!

About a week ago, a Christian woman was driving on Highway 74, north of Terre Haute, IN, when she saw a man walking beside the road. She felt impressed to stop and offer him a ride. But because she was alone, and because it's usually not a good idea to do so, she resisted the feeling and went on by. However, the thought kept coming to her, and wanting to be sensitive to the leading of the Holy Spirit, she obeyed.

The man opened the passenger side door, but instead of getting in he told her that he had a message for her from God. He said, "Jesus is coming soon." And then he vanished right before her eyes! Surprised and shook up by the realization of what had just happened to her, she just sat there for a while trying to digest it.

As she was recovering from her shock, a State Trooper pulled up to check on her. She assured him that she was all right, and told him what had happened. He said, "You're the fourth person to report such an encounter along this road this morning."

Also, in Pennsylvania, about two weeks prior to this there were a number of people that had a similar experience. In one case the witness was actually driving after picking a man up when he said nearly the same thing and disappeared while sitting in the passenger seat.

In all cases the men walking beside the road didn't seem special, just men.

Now, I know some people will think this is just a trick of the devil, but I ask you to look at the message instead of the person who brought the message or the way in which it was delivered. Far be it from the devil to preach encouragement to the saints of the Lord. The disciples of Jesus saw a man one time who was casting out devils in Jesus' name, and they told him to stop doing so because he wasn't "one of them." But Jesus said, "Do not forbid him, for no one who works a miracle in My name can soon afterward speak evil of Me. For he who is not against us is on our side."

The apostle Paul also wrote about men that preached the gospel for personal gain, and while it grieved him to see them do it, he rejoiced that the gospel was preached.

Even so, Lord Jesus, come quickly!

Monday, January 11, 2010

Global Warming In Serious Trouble

Watch this short video from John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel. Finally, a REAL EXPERT showing the fallacy of the concept of “human caused” global warming.



Since the Climategate scandal and the Copenhagen summit, some scientists once again have the courage to voice their true feelings, and for some of them that is to express concerns about a coming ice age. Which would fit the pattern.

The truth is, no one has proved yet that fossil fuel emissions has affected the temperature in any way at all. And more and more evidence shows that the UN's computer models that predict a dramatic warming in the near future are flawed. They are based on ideas and theories that have been proven false.

Let me be clear: I believe in taking care of our earth, and in conservation, and in living in harmony with nature as much as possible. But why do these people keep feeding us lies? It is because they have an evil agenda, and all it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.