All it takes for evil to prevail is for good men (or women) to do nothing!
Monday, December 28, 2009
What The Second Amendment Is Really For
All it takes for evil to prevail is for good men (or women) to do nothing!
Monday, December 21, 2009
Babies In The Military
Like Eugene Fidell said, who teaches military law at Yale Law School and is president of the National Institute of Military Justice, the policy is fraught with "legal, ethical and policy issues.”
I'm almost scared to pick this one apart. I understand very well why a commander would want such a policy, to prevent a soldier from leaving a void at a moment critical to the success of a mission. Army-wide rules require that a soldier that becomes pregnant in Iraq be removed from the war within 14 days. But it still doesn't seem right to prohibit a husband and wife from having a baby.
I've heard a couple of suggestions to solve the problem, such as not permitting females on the front lines in the first place, and to not allow a man and his wife to be stationed in the same area. The first solution, while not exactly keeping them from becoming pregnant, would help prevent an unexpected absence on the front lines. To keep a man and his wife apart when they could be together is bad simply because a husband and wife should be together when possible.
Perhaps the women should go back to being keepers at home. While I do NOT believe in the subjugation or suppression of women, they made the greatest mistake in the history of womankind (next to what Eve did in the garden of Eden) when they joined the general work force. They should've never entered politics or the pulpit, and never tried to take a man's place in the work force. It's contrary to the Word of God, and when you replace It with your own ideas you run into trouble.
Though all men are liars, God is still True!
Monday, December 14, 2009
Is Another Civil War Looming?
According to these reports, Obama has had over these past weeks 'numerous' meetings with his war council abut how best to manage the expected implosion of his Nation's banking system while at the same time attempting to keep the United States military hegemony over the World in what Russian Military Analysts state is a 'last ditch gambit' whose success is 'far from certain.'
The EU Times article continues by saying, "To the fears of Obama over the United States erupting into civil war once the full extent of the rape and pillaging of these peoples by their banks and government becomes known to them, grim evidence now shows the likelihood of this occurring much sooner than later."
The Times story goes on to say that there are "over 220 million American people armed to the teeth and ready to explode."
The Times article concludes by saying, "Though the coming civil war in the United States is being virtually ignored by their propaganda media, the same cannot be said of Russia, where leading Russian political analyst, Professor Igor Panarin has long warned that the economic turmoil in the United States has confirmed his long-held view that the US is heading for collapse."
Very interesting article. Here is a link to the rest of it. Read it in its entirety and become active in your state!
Also, here is a link to the full article in the European Union Times.
All it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing!
Monday, December 7, 2009
Oklahoma Goes Renegade
Guess what.......... Oklahoma did it anyway.
Oklahoma recently passed a law in the state to incarcerate all illegal immigrants, and ship them back to where they came from unless they want to get a green card and become an American citizen. They all scattered. HB 1804. Hope they didn't get sent to your state. This was against the advice of the Federal Government, and the ACLU, they said it would be a mistake.
Guess what.......... Oklahoma did it anyway.
Recently they passed a law to include DNA samples from any and all illegals to the Oklahoma database, for criminal investigative purposes. Pelosi said it was unconstitutional. SB 1102
Guess what........ Oklahoma did it anyway.
Several weeks ago, they passed a law declaring Oklahoma as a Sovereign state, not under the Federal Government directives. Joining Texas, Montana and Utah as the only states to do so. More states are likely to follow: Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, the Carolinas, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Arkansas, West Virginia, Mississippi, Florida. Save your confederate money, it appears the South is about to rise up once again. HJR 1003
The federal Government has made bold steps to take away our guns. Oklahoma, a week ago, passed a law confirming people in this state have the right to bear arms and transport them in their vehicles. I'm sure that was a set back for the criminals (and Obamites). Liberals didn't like it -- But ...
Guess what........... Oklahoma did it anyway.
Also, this same state has voted and passed a law that ALL driver's license exams will be printed in English, and only English, and no other language. They have been called racist for doing this, but the fact is that ALL of the road signs are in English only. If you want to drive in Oklahoma , you must read and write English.
Really simple.
By the way, Obama does not like any of this.
Guess what....who cares... Oklahoma is doing it anyway.
Information for this article comes from NewsOK, the online version of "The Oklahoman," and USA Today.
Okay, so how do I really feel about all this? I admit, I have mixed feelings about some of the laws that are mentioned. But I'm open to discussion about whether they are good or bad. Does anybody out there have any experience either way? I know a lot of people object to the idea of having a monument of the Ten Commandments on government property, citing the possibility that Muslims or other religions may in all fairness also want to have their sacred symbols on display. But let me raise a few questions.
I hear the objection all the time that it is unconstitutional. Pray tell, how is it unconstitutional? What part of the Constitution does it violate? I don't believe it violates any part of it, especially if you take it the way the Founding Fathers intended it to be read.
Next question: What would be wrong with refusing to set up religious symbols of other beliefs if they requested it? You say, "Religious discrimination!" So?? If the majority of the lawmakers that the general population elected are Christian and are in favor of Christian emblems on state or government property, why in the world should they not do it?? How can this possibly mean that they would then also have to give minority groups similar recognition? That's ridiculous! Whatever happened to majority vote? I mean, this is religious preference, not religious oppression! Perhaps it should be by the vote of the people and not the lawmakers, but I don't see much difference. The majority rules. If you don't like it, how about relocating? If you really, really don't like it, that is. The minority religions are in no way being cheated or used unfairly. The majority simply votes against granting them a special (mark this: special) recognition. It's not denying them their rights, or anything they deserve (especially if they aren't American citizens!)
Now you may ask me, "If the majority were Hindu, and wanted to do a similar exhibit, should they have the right to do so?" Yes, they should! Majority rules! You just can't rule in the way of suppressing or oppressing other religions. Our Constitution grants religious protections, and freedom from harassment or persecution. At least it used to. Christians are losing those rights every day.
Way to go, Oklahoma!
Wonder how much land is going for in OK.? OKLAHOMA MAY JUST BE THE PLACE TO LIVE!
All it takes for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing.